Compilation of Articles that show how masks are ineffective and harmfulpdf
Compilation of Articles that show how masks are ineffective and harmfulpdf
Page 1 of 430
Rob Shapiro shared this file. Want to do more with it?
  1. 1Here is a list of articles on mask wearing by America’s Frontline Doctors:https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/all-you-need-to-know-about-facemasks-but-didnt-know-to-ask/All you need to know about facemasks, but didn’t know to ask posted Mordechai SonesAugust 12, 2021 5:46pmreprinted with permission byRodef Shalom 613To help inform your decision-making, we compiled the following list of articles, videos, and papers about wearing facemasks:Children1.APhysician’sTakeonNewMaskMandateshttps://thehighwire.com/videos/a-physicians-take-on-new-mask-mandates/2.FormerCDCDirectorSpeaksOutOnMaskshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfC3yxpCfA83.Horowitz:Newstudyshowsmask-wearingchildrenatriskfor‘unacceptable’CO2levels,cautionsagainstthepracticehttps://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-new-study-shows-mask-wearing-children-at-risk-for-unacceptable-co2-levels-cautions-against-the-practice4.MaskingChildren:Tragic,Unscientific,andDamaginghttps://www.aier.org/article/masking-children-tragic-unscientific-and-damaging/5.Areyouhappyorsad?Howwearingfacemaskscanimpactchildren’sabilitytoreademotionshttps://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2020/04/21/are-you-happy-or-sad-how-wearing-face-masks-can-impact-childrens-ability-to-read-emotions/6.Coronavirusdisease(COVID-19):Childrenandmaskshttps://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-children-and-masks-related-to-covid-197.AGroupofParentsSentTheirKids’FaceMaskstoALabforAnalysis.Here’sWhatTheyFound
  2. 2https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scottmorefield/2021/06/15/a-group-of-parents-sent-their-kids-face-masks-to-a-lab-for-analysis-heres-what-they-found-n25910478.DanStock’sPresentationtotheMt.VernonSchoolBoardinIndianaOvertheFutilityofMaskMandatesandCovid-19Protocolshttps://hancockcountypatriots.blogspot.com/2021/08/dr-dan-stocks-presentation-to-mt-vernon.html9.Howwearingamaskatschoolcanimpactachild’sdevelopmenthttps://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/how-wearing-a-mask-at-school-can-impact-a-child-s-development-1.5105832Efficacy1.Facemaskstopreventtransmissionofinfluenzavirus:asystematicreview|Epidemiology&Infection|CambridgeCorehttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-%20review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05AreFaceMasksEffective–WhatStudiesShowhttps://www.rodefshalom613.org/2020/10/are-face-masks-effective-what-studies-show/2.TheScienceisConclusive:MasksandRespiratorsdoNOTPreventTransmissionofViruses—Science&Technology—Sott.nethttps://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses3.MasksDon’tWork:AReviewofScienceRelevanttoCOVID-19SocialPolicy|RiverCities’Readerhttps://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
  3. 34.WhyFaceMasksDon’tWork:ARevealingReview–OralHealthGrouphttps://web.archive.org/web/20200605090916/https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/5.AdviceontheuseoffacemasksinthecontextofCovid19https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332293/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.4-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y6.InvestigationoftheFiltrationPropertiesofMedicalMaskshttps://sci-hub.se/10.1533/9780857090348.937.COMMENTARY:Masks-for-allforCOVID-19notbasedonsounddata|CIDRAPhttps://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data8.RationalGround–ClearReasoningonNationalPolicyforCOVID-19»Maskchartshttps://rationalground.com/mask-charts/Harm1.Study:Long-TermMaskUseMayContributeToAdvancedStageLungCancerhttps://sorendreier.com/study-long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-to-advanced-stage-lung-cancer/2.ProofThatFaceMasksDoMoreHarmThanGoodhttps://vernoncoleman.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/proof-that-face-masks-do-more-harm-than-good-v2.pdf3.FaceMasksCausing“DecayingTeeth,RecedingGumLinesandSeriouslySourBreath”ReportsNYDentists–GlobalResearch–CentreforResearchonGlobalizationhttps://www.globalresearch.ca/masks-causing-decaying-teeth-receding-gum-lines-sour-breath-reports-ny-dentists/5725623
  4. 44.GermanneurologistMargaretaGrieszBrisson:MASKSAREDANGEROUS!!!https://www.bitchute.com/video/Blzj0nJFEnpZ/5.7Long-TermSideEffectsofWearingFaceMasks|FacultyofMedicinehttps://web.archive.org/web/20200903225802/https://forum.facmedicine.com/threads/7-long-term-side-effects-of-wearing-face-masks.51209/6.Covid-19:importantpotentialsideeffectsofwearingfacemasksthatweshouldbearinmind|TheBMJhttps://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1435/rr-407.Clothmasks–dangeroustoyourhealth?|SchoolofPublicHealthandCommunityMedicinehttps://web.archive.org/web/20200831072916/https://sphcm.med.unsw.edu.au/news/cloth-masks-%E2%80%93-dangerous-your-health8.OSHAexpertsdiscussfittestingforwearingmasksintheworkplacehttps://vimeo.com/4475645579.DrLeeMerrittspeakingonMasks,Lockdowns–YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0LioZvXH78&feature=youtu.be10.AreFaceMasksSafetoWear?https://www.rodefshalom613.org/2020/10/are-face-masks-safe-to-wear/Health Agencies1.Shouldyouwearafacemask?WHOofficialsweighinattoday’sCOVID-19briefinghttps://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/who-should-wear-a-face-mask-30-march-who-briefing/2.NonpharmaceuticalMeasuresforPandemicInfluenzainNonhealthcareSettings—PersonalProtectiveandEnvironmentalMeasures–Volume26,Number5—May2020–EmergingInfectiousDiseasesjournal–CDChttps://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
  5. 53.CDC–CommunityandCloseContactExposure–page4https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdfHealthcare1.Disposablesurgicalfacemasks:asystematicreview–PubMedhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16295987/2.Facemasksforthepreventionofinfectioninhealthcareandcommunitysettingshttps://sci-hub.se/10.1136/bmj.h6943.Surgicalfacemasksintheoperatingtheatre:re-examiningtheevidencehttps://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701(00)90912-5/pdf4.UseofSurgicalMasksintheOperatingRoom:AReviewoftheClinicalEffectivenessandGuidelines|CADTH.cahttps://www.cadth.ca/use-surgical-masks-operating-room-review-clinical-effectiveness-and-guidelines5.Doesevidencebasedmedicinesupporttheeffectivenessofsurgicalfacemasksinpreventingpostoperativewoundinfectionsinelectivesurgery?http://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/PAST/21-2/Zahid.pdf6.Preliminaryreportonsurgicalmaskinduceddeoxygenationduringmajorsurgeryhttps://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s1130-1473(08)70235-57.Surgicalfacemasksintheoperatingtheatre:re-examiningtheevidence–ScienceDirecthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195670100909125?via%3Dihubfullarticle:https://sci-hub.se/10.1053/jhin.2000.09128.EffectivenessofMasksandRespiratorsAgainstRespiratoryInfectionsinHealthcareWorkers:ASystematicReviewandMeta-Analysis|ClinicalInfectiousDiseases|OxfordAcademichttps://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
  6. 69.Surgicalmasksassourceofbacterialcontaminationduringoperativeprocedures–ScienceDirecthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X18300809Lawsuits1.MissouriAttorneyGeneralfilesanothersuitagainstmaskmandatesafterwinninghissuitagainstSt.Louis.https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/press-releases/kc-mask-petition—final.pdf?sfvrsn=7ecf0e57_22.Masklawsuithttps://www.nystandsup.org/https://fa3f9cd8-9ebf-446a-92af-2cdd1d5f6194.filesusr.com/ugd/48e0db_6757064e169b4b77b1105948b4ec8ffa.pdf3.MedicalJournalWarnsAboutMasks’PotentiallyDevastatingConsequenceshttps://www.aier.org/article/medical-journal-warns-about-maskss-potentially-devastating-consequences/Politics1.DoWeNeedMaskMandates?CITYJ.(Mar.22,2021),https://www.city-journal.org/do-we-need-mask-mandates2.StillNoConclusiveEvidenceJustifyingMandatoryMasks|RiverCities’Readerhttps://www.rcreader.com/commentary/still-no-conclusive-evidence-justifying-mandatory-masks3.MaskFanaticsHaveOfficiallyAbandonedSciencetoControlYourLife|Frontpagemaghttps://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/09/mask-fanatics-have-officially-abandoned-science-georgi-boorman/#.X2yUR2DHZuQ.whatsappReligious Perspective1.Doesfacemask-wearingconformtoJewishlaw
  7. 7Hereareadditionalarticlesthatrelatetothissubject:1.https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-15-california-seeing-4x-more-covid-cases-florida.htmlMASKS DON’T WORK: California seeing 4X more daily covid cases than FloridaWednesday, December 15, 2021 by: Ethan HuffTags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, California, cases, coronavirus, COVID, DeSantis, fascism, Florida, infections, masks, newsom, outbreak, pandemic, Plandemic, Restrictions, rigged, Twisted(Natural News) Despite all of its remaining mandates and other Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions, California is seeingfour timesthe number of new daily infections than Florida, which is mostly open and restriction-free.According to The New York Times, California is showing a daily average of 6,353 new “covid” cases. This translates to 16 cases per 100,000 people, or a 61 percent case increase over the past two weeks.Florida, comparatively, is seeing a daily case average of only 1,506, or seven per every 100,000 people. This represents a 20 percent decreaseover the past 14 days.Freedom and good health go hand in handAs for Florida, there has never been a statewide mask mandate, even at the “peak” of the plandemic. Everything that was mandated was done so locally, and DeSantis has fought against that at every turn.At an August press conference in The Villages, DeSantis reiterated his position that masks “should not be mandated.”“No government entity should force you to do that. That is your choice. If that’s something you believe provides you protection, no one is going to say anything to you. But that should not, absolutely not be mandated,” he stated at the time.“I will say that from a scientific perspective, you have, even some of these experts now are acknowledging, with an aerosolized virus, a piece of cloth is not going to stop the aerosols.”At this point, the science could not be clearer: Masks do not work, and neither do mandates that force people to do things that they do not want to do, and that are unnatural.
  8. 8Blocking one’s breathing passages with cloth and plastic is not good for health. It prevents the free exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide (CO2) and has been shown to cause a host of health problems.If California would figure this out and adopt policies that embrace freedom rather than tyranny, then the state’s caseload would likely plummet just like it now is in Florida. Until that time, hospitals in the Golden State will continue to be flooded with patients that wore their masks religiously but still “caught” Chinese Germs.2.https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-13-studies-prove-lockdowns-mask-mandates-harmful-health.htmlMore than 400 studies prove that lockdowns, mask mandates are harmful to human healthMonday, December 13, 2021 by: Ethan HuffTags: Anxiety, badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, big government, COVID, Dangerous Medicine, depression, health freedom, lockdowns, mask mandates, medical fascism, Medical Tyranny, mental health, Plandemic, research, truth(Natural News) The overwhelming body of evidence shows thatmasks and coverings for the face do absolutely nothing to promote health or protect against any alleged virus.More than 400 studies, in fact, provethat not only mask mandates but also lockdowns and shelter-in-place policies are destroying people’s health, not promoting it.“These restrictive policies were ineffective and devastating failures, causing immense harm especially to the poorer and vulnerable within societies,” reported LifeSiteNews.Even so, nearly all major governments have imposed these restrictions on their people, which has only fueled the plandemicwhile simultaneously destroyingthe economy.An analysis of all available science found that “in the framework of this analysis, there is no evidence that more restrictive nonpharmaceutical interventions (‘lockdowns’) contributed substantially to bending the curve of new cases in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, or the United States in early 2020.”None of this is news to people who have been paying attention to real science all this time as opposed to mainstream media “science.” Regardless, it needs to be shouted from the rooftops as loudly and as often as possible to wake up the sleeping masses.
  9. 9The alleged benefits of lockdowns and mask mandates have been greatly exaggerated, it turns out. They have also been falsely touted as beneficial when the fact of the matter is that they are harming people, especially the most vulnerable.“... the harms to our societies and children have been severe,” added LifeSiteNews.“... the harms to children, the undiagnosed illness that will result in excess mortality in years to come, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation in our young people, drug overdoses and suicides due to the lockdown policies, the crushing isolation due to the lockdowns, psychological harms, domestic and child abuse, sexual abuse of children, loss of jobs and businesses and the devastating impact, and the massive numbers of deaths resulting from the lockdowns that will impact heavily on women and minorities.”Tyrants want another round of full-scale tyranny in response to OmicronReal science does not matter to policymakers, though, which are chomping at the bit to plunge everyone back into the same tyranny as last year with the arrival of the new “Omicron” (Moronic) variant.Even though the Moronicvariant originated in and is being spread by the “fully vaccinated,”government figureheads once again want everyone to get their “booster” shots and stay at home in a mask all day long in order to “cure” it.“It was clear very early on that Task Forces and medical advisors and decision-makers were not reading the evidence, were not up to speed with the science or data, did not understand the evidence, did not ‘get’ the evidence, and were blinded to the science, often driven by their own prejudices, biases, arrogance, and ego,” LifeSiteNewswent on to report.“They remain ensconced in sheer academic sloppiness and laziness. It was clear that the response was not a public health one. It was a political one from day one and continues today.”One recent study found that children born during the plandemicand all of its restrictions now have “significantly reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance compared to children born pre-pandemic.”Males and children born to lower socioeconomic families are also said to be “most affected” by lockdowns, mask mandates and now the jab push.All of this is just a large-scale experiment in modern-day fascism, and sadly too many people are still fallingfor the lie that this is about ridding the world of a “virus.”More of the latest news about the destruction of society at the hands of the plandemictyrants can be found at Fascism.news.
  10. 10Sources for this article include:LifeSiteNews.comNaturalNews.com
  11. 113.https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-06-mask-study-mandates-complete-sham-raw-data.htmlWidely-hyped mask study used to push mandates turns out to be a complete sham upon raw data releaseMonday, December 06, 2021 by: Ethan HuffTags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, Bangladesh, COVID, flawed, junk science, masks, Plandemic, pseudoscience, rigged, science clowns, science fraud, Study(Natural News) Raw data from the infamous Bangladeshi mask mandate study has finally been released. And it shows that, contrary to what the mainstream media claimed all last year, wearing a mask does nothing to promote health or protect against disease.It took them long enough, but the authors of the research finally came clean, revealing an absolute different of 20 symptomatic cases over eight weeks between mask wearers and non-mask wearers.Since the sample size of participants was around 340,000 people, a difference of 20 cases is basically zero. In essence, there is no difference in health outcomes between people who wear a mask and those that do not wear a mask.Back in September, Ben Recht from Principia Scientific Internationalhighlighted the fact that the study did not come with any raw data right out of the gate. This prevented him and anyone else who was interested from running the numbers for themselves.“I also objected to the number of statistical regressions run to pull signals out of a very complex intervention,” he writes.After said data was finally released, Recht ran his own calculations and came to the realization that the world was hoodwinked by the mask “science,” which does not actually exist.“In the Bangladesh Mask RCT, there were nC=163,861 individuals from 300 villages in the control group,” Recht writes. “There were nT=178,322 individuals from 300 villages in the intervention group. The main end point of the study was whether their intervention reduced the number of individuals who both reported covid-like symptoms and tested seropositive at some point during the trial.”“The number of such individuals appears nowhere in their paper, and one has to compute this from the data they kindly provided: There were iC=1,106 symptomatic individuals confirmed seropositive in the control group and iT=1,086 such individuals in the treatment group. The
  12. 12difference between the two groups was small: only 20 casesout of over 340,000 individuals over a span of 8 weeks.”There is no legitimate science proving that masks protect against diseaseBased on these numbers, it is difficult to imagine how anyone could come to the conclusion that “masks work,” and yet this is what was proclaimed from every major media outlet and political talking-head for months and months and months.Recht also pointed out that the study was not blinded because it was not possible, seeing as how it was obvious just based on outward appearance who was wearing a mask and who was not wearing a mask.“Moreover, individuals were only added to the study if they consented to allow the researchers to visit and survey their household,” Recht further explained. “There was a large differential between the control and treatment groups here, with 95 percent consenting in the treatment group but only 92 percent consenting in control.”“This differential alone could wash away the difference in observed cases. Finally, symptomatic seropositivity is a crude measure of covid as the individuals could have been infected before the trial began.”Despite an aggressive “educational program,” free masks, encouraged mask wearing, and constant surveillance, the only thing the Bangladesh mask study found is that masks do nothing to fight a plandemic.The same goes for the “vaccines,” which have never been shown to do anything but spread more disease.“The bottom line: masks cannot prevent the spread of a virus,” wrote one commenter at Principia Scientific International.“I found this study when Covid first hit and have been telling everyone I talk to about the findings, but for the most part, most people have been Fauci-ed and deny the results,” wrote another.More of the latest news about Chinese Virus tyranny can be found at Fascism.news.Sources for this article include:Twitter.comPrincipia-Scientific.comNaturalNews.com
We use cookies to provide, improve, protect and promote our services. Visit our Privacy Policy and Privacy Policy FAQs to learn more. You can manage your personal preferences, including your ‘Do not sell or share my personal data to third parties’ setting using the “Customize cookies” button below.